Is there Inequality in Education?
I have many ambitious students. One student wants to be a chemist, another wants to be a pilot, and two others want to be pediatricians. These students have never seen a microscope, a telescope, or a chemistry lab. When I attended school, these were commonplace. What we are dealing with is a basic inequality in education.
School district funding is still based on property taxes, which perpetuates inequality. The best academic resources go to the affluent, those who can pay for it, not necessarily to the most gifted students. Therefore, people are educated based on zip codes, not their aptitudes.
In China, advancement is based on aptitude, not affluence. Look at STEM Graduates: China 4.7M (Total population: 1.386B); USA only has 568K! Granted, China has more people, but education is not optional or a privilege there.
Students lose their ambition when they see that they do not have the basic resources to fully participate. The most difficult problem that students have is not math, science, understanding geopolitics or conjugating verbs. The greatest challenge our students have is facing society's rejection of their gifts and talents by celebrating the entertainers and athletes but not making provisions in public education for them to develop their aptitudes.
We make valuable STEM enrichment opportunities and technology available to teachers and students that normally won't have the same access that more affluent schools do. Affluent schools are more likely to offer coding/Cmputer Science as part of their curriculum.
Our STEM program offers resources to students that have high mechanical, technological acumen, and an interest in science or engineering but have limited opportunities to develop it.